jurisdiction of the Rajuk (Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya) received due approval of their designs. This happened during the nine years alone between 2008 when the building code was framed and the year 2017. In between the Dhaka Area Plan (DAP) 2010 came into existence and since then 4,790 structures were constructed until the physical feature survey of 2015-16. Of these structures only 0.06 per cent obtained permission and 99.94 per cent did not bother to get any permission.
What then happened
before that period is anybody's guess. Although Rajuk officials have
tried to explain that many in the union councils and municipalities
did not even know about the DAP and most of those local bodies were
unaware that those were under the Rajuk's jurisdiction. Now
whose duty is it to inform that the DAP must be respected and which
areas fall within its limit?
Even then the small portion of approval hardly justifies the authority that the Rajuk exerts. It obliquely refers to the near total lack of any initiative or exercise of power by the Rajuk to enforce the rules and regulations in terms of construction. It is good to know that the authority is no longer issuing certificates for occupancy. In the nine years under survey, 173 structures were issued such certificates. Now the question is immaterial if non-compliance with the DAP requirements or building codes is deliberate or out of ignorance. It will be considered a violation of laws and rules and accordingly the Rajuk is all set to take action. That much of the blame lies with the housing authority is evident from the tacit admission by its spokesperson. He admits that the previous list of permitted structures was faulty. Lack of consistency bedevilled the occupancy versus land use rules.
Now the city
development authority has made its intention clear that it will demolish the
unauthorised structures in the city areas under its jurisdiction. In
fact, it began such a programme from June last. It has served notice
on 1,932 house owners and dismantled parts of 13 structures. Past
experiences of such drives, however, are not happy enough. Stay orders
from courts or opposition by influential people forced the
development authority to back out. There are rare instances where buildings
constructed without authorisation could be brought down.
Courtesy: The
Financial Express Editorial Aug 25, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment